Friday, April 19, 2013

Journal #11 Emily Babski, Stuart McDonald, Tony Jackson


We have a large sample size of individuals that we have been able to get interviews from who are undergraduates and graduates of music-related majors. It has also been easy to collect data on our surveys as well. We have officially decided however, to cut out the recently graduated and professional groups that we were originally going to include. We are running out of time and we believe that our project will be more beneficial if we can focus on just comparing graduates’ and undergraduates’ perceptions. Our decision to restrict our sample population is an effort on our behalf to avoid throwing together a sloppy final product.

Our method for finding participants to interview and answer survey questions was quite good and has proven to be effective  Emily’s inside track to our prospective sample population helped us make quick and easy work of the question asking (and also helped us avoid awkward introductions). We have had several interviews with both graduate and undergraduate students alike. We have learned a lot through the interactions with the people we have interviewed and it has added substantially to our fieldwork.

We answered the question regarding our hypothesis in the last journal, but we will reiterate that we collected data from our undergraduate and graduate sample population this week and we found that our hypothesis, a positive expectance from those still in school, was supported by our findings. We had no problems acquiring information from our sample population of undergraduates and graduates. We were unsure of what to expect in regards to findings for our graduate/professional sample population but we discovered a trend similar to the one displayed in the numbers collected from our undergrads. We were surprised that all of our graduate respondents displayed positive opinions on their degree’s effectiveness, career-wise. 

No comments:

Post a Comment